Cash game strategy

The daily grind

Last month's downswing forced Rick Dacey to rethink his game, but can the results match his ambition?

As September dawns I can’t get past the fact that I’m at my lowest total profit since day one – a measly $103. Yes, I’ve been battered by a gruesome run of outdraws, but I also know I haven’t been playing my A-game. As my bankroll has dwindled I’ve been trying harder to boss the tables, and pulling unnecessary moves in an attempt to catch up.

The result of this chasing is that I’ve been playing four $100 no-limit Hold’em tables with just one buy-in behind (my daily Badbeat bankroll is $500). Obviously, that’s not great bankroll management, so I decide to try a new approach. I opt for the ‘more the merrier’ route and open up six tables with $50 on each. I quickly find that if I bust one of these smaller buy-ins it’s not as big a problem, as I still have three or four rebuys behind, and there’s always a table or two where John’s aggressive tactics pay dividends. On one table, for instance, I manage to run $50 up to almost $700 in a single session!

Deadly focus

Instead of the multi-table action splitting my attention, it actually helps sharpen and focus my play. There’s no time to check emails, half-heartedly follow what’s on TV, or get snarled up about another bad beat, because glancing away from the action for more than a couple of seconds can see me losing track of hands completely. Having a shorter stack also leaves me fewer big decisions to make post-flop, and by the time I’ve managed to grind my stack up to over 100 big blinds I’ve got good reads on the tables. It’s a tactic that’s worth trying some time if you find your focus waning.

Anyway, as you can see from the graph below, my plan has worked and I’ve had a stellar month. With the end of the Badbeat project in sight it’s good to see some decent profit after a couple of months of turmoil. The question now is, can I maintain the delicate balance of aggression and insanity that John’s game dictates, or will I have one last rage-up and leave my account in tatters? Find out in my final instalment next month.

Bookmark this post with:

0 Comment

Be the first to comment on this article

You need to register to post comments. Existing members can log in below to comment, otherwise click here to join.



[ GET RSS ]

 
Advertisement

DACEY: Donkey or shark?

BY JOHN TABATABAI
DACEY: 4-4
VILLAIN: Q-Q
BLINDS: $0.50/$1
BOARD: 8-5-4-2-9

You get pocket Fours in early position and raise it up. When I enter a pot I like to come in for a raise so I’ve no problem with that. You bet $5 after hitting bottom set, which is a relatively weak lead. He calls making the pot $21.50. The turn is the 2 and although there’s the possibility he has the wheel that’s definitely on the far end of his range. Given his usual pre-flop behaviour you’re hoping he’s got an overpair, which is where you’ll be getting maximum value. Seeing as you picked up action on the flop you bet a near pot-sized $18. The villain calls making the pot $57.50. The river is the 9, and you bet $27 of the villain’s remaining $49. He‘s called all the way so far meaning that you‘ve been ahead or behind from the flop, so when he shoves you’ve got what you want. He turns over Queens and you pick up the pot.

JOHN’S VERDICT: SHARK
BADBEAT DETAILS: AUGUST 19: +$644 / SEPTEMBER 18: +$1,838
HANDS PLAYED: 28,639 TOTAL (THIS MONTH AROUND 4,600)
BIGGEST POT WON: $308 (J-K VS J-Q)
BIGGEST POT LOST: $263 (A-J VS K-6)


 
Advertisement

SPONSORED LINKS